🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.